Welcome to KIWIreviews - product reviews
•  click here to return to the homepage  •
Welcome visitor.Join us or log in

Product reviews on KIWIreviews.co.nz : Monday 26th August 2019 - 11:21:19

QuickSearch for:    What is QuickSearch?
QuickJump to:    What is QuickJump?
logon name: p/w:  
I want to:

You Are Here...

Home > Categories > Movies > Drama > On The Basis Of Sex review

« Huawei Y6 Pro 2019 reviewHuawei Y6 Pro 2019Mika and Max reviewMika and Max »

Score: 8.3/10  [1 review]
3 out of 5
ProdID: 8314 - On The Basis Of Sex
Directed by Mimi Leder

On The Basis Of Sex
Price:
$24.95
Sample/s Supplied by:
Click to search for all products supplied by Universal Pictures NZ

Disclosure StatementFULL DISCLOSURE: A number of units of this product have, at some time, been supplied to KIWIreviews by the company for the purposes of unbiased, independent reviews. No fee was accepted by KIWIreviews or the reviewers themselves - these are genuine, unpaid consumer reviews.
Available:
June 2019

On The Basis Of Sex product reviews

All rise for the fight of the century!

Inspired by the powerful true story of Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Felicity Jones), On The Basis Of Sex depicts a struggling young attorney and new mother facing adversity in her fight for equal rights. When Ruth takes on a ground-breaking case, she knows the outcome could alter the courts' view of gender discrimination. Ruth teams up with her husband Martin Ginsburg (Armie Hammer) to fight the case that catapults her into becoming one of the most important public figures of our time.

Check out Universal Pictures NZ onlineClick here to see all the listings for Universal Pictures NZ Visit their website They do not have a Twitter account Check them out on Facebook They do not have a YouTube Channel They do not have a Pinterest board They do not have an Instagram channel



Tags:
armie hammer   drama   felicity jones   fight of the century   gender discrimination   martin ginsburg   mimi leder   ruth bader ginsburg   us supreme court justice
Other listings you may be interested in:
Matilda - Deluxe EditionMatilda - Deluxe Edition
Rating: 9.0
BlacKkKlansmanBlacKkKlansman
Rating: 9.5
Captain PhillipsCaptain Phillips
Rating: 9.8
EpicEpic
Rating: 8.9
The X-Files: The Complete Season 11The X-Files: The Complete Season 11
Rating: 9.0
MonstersMonsters
Rating: 8.6
Don Juan de MarcoDon Juan de Marco
Rating: 4.3
R.I.P.D.R.I.P.D.
Rating: 8.0
30 Minutes or Less30 Minutes or Less
Rating: 6.5
Hot PursuitHot Pursuit
Rating: 9.8
The Secret Exhibit - A LEGO AdventureThe Secret Exhibit - A LEGO Adventure
Rating: 8.5
The Virgin QueenThe Virgin Queen
Rating: 3.5
ElephantElephant
Rating: 8.8

Product reviews...

Everyone is welcome to post a review. You will need to Join up or log in to post yours.

Click here to read the profile of savta

Review by: savta (Jo)
Dated: 14th of June, 2019

Link to this review Report this review

 

This Review: 8.3/10
Pay to see it again:
Score 9 out of 10
Attention Span:
Score 8 out of 10
Believeability:
Score 8 out of 10
Personal Choice:
Score 8 out of 10

Having already seen the documentary RBG, I was fascinated to see what sort of take director Mimi Leder would have on translating the early life of a still-living personality into a movie drama, and what sort of liberties might be taken with her life story in the pursuit of art. There is a huge difference between a rigidly true-to-life portrayal and a story which allows some poetic licence to better entice the viewer. To a large extent this version works as a way of introducing Ruth Bader Ginsburg to a younger generation who may not have heard of her, and therefore a few lapses in reality can be forgiven in the process.

The main protagonists (Felicity Jones as Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Armie Hammer as Marty Ginsburg) are believable, if a little too physically perfect - the real Ginsburgs were much less conventionally handsome; however, it is the prerogative of Hollywood to present attractive actors in key roles as a draw card to the viewers. What does come across strongly in the screenplay is the strong bond between the two right from the start of their relationship. It is made very clear that their love survives Marty's early illness, continuing right through their lives and individual careers. The movie also emphasises Ruth's quiet strength, underlining this early on when she challenges another student as he answers a question incorrectly - thus establishing herself not only as a highly intelligent and well-prepared lawyer-in-the-making, but also as a woman who is going to challenge the status quo.

There were times when the movie was not as fast paced as it could have been; although the plot centred primarily around Bader Ginsburg's first successful human rights case, and as a consequence included a large amount of dialogue, there was still scope for more physical interaction. The characters were a little too genteel for me; although the director may have been intending to emphasise the basic soft approach that Bader Ginsburg was developing in order to catch her opposition unawares, I think this could still have been conveyed in a greater variety of ways. The actors were adequate, but there were no great performances that stood out. Even the wonderful Kathy Bates (Dorothy Kenyon) was not used to full effect; I was initially impressed to see that she was one of the cast, but even her inclusion did not serve to spice things up. In fact, I believe a good twenty minutes could have been pared from the movie without significantly affecting the outcome.

One device I did find effective was the metamorphosis of the actor Felicity Jones into the real-life Bader Ginsburg, right at the end of the movie. Metamorphosis is possibly the wrong word as there was no physical transformation from one to the other; the sequence was carried out through the judicious placement of pillars so that there was no need for special effects. However. the implication of this device is that Bader Ginsburg had offered her personal approval of the way she has been presented in the film.

I also appreciated the inclusion of such painstaking detail to reflect the passage of 20 years between the early 1950s and the early 1970s. The 1950s are presented as a time when women knew their place, and "human rights" were based on tradition rather than reason. Over the time period covered by the movie, historical development is defined by subtle changes in clothing, house decor, car models - even the number of people smoking in public is seen to decrease. There were some interesting background shots such as that highlighting Cosmopolitan magazine, where a hoarding on the facade of a building was used to reflect the changing status of women (as the female was depicted in a dominant position while the male rested his head on her knee).

For someone who previously knew nothing of Bader Ginsburg's life and contribution to equal rights for men and women (meaning that discrimination could no longer be tolerated "on the basis of sex"), this film provides a useful introduction to her accomplishments. It is meant for the average viewer, not the budding lawyer or politician or human rights activist. Despite the somewhat slow-moving plot and the odd missed cinematic opportunities, it does offer a basic overview of the early career of one of the most influential women of our time.

Guest comments...

Random listing from 'Movies'...

Score: 7.5
Product reviews for listing 2640: S. Darko
Directed by Chris Fisher

Product image for S. DarkoIt's time to travel forward.

Seven years after the first film Donnie's little sister Samantha Darko and her best friend Corey are now 18 and on a road trip to Los Angeles when they are plagued by bizarre visions.

Starring: Daveigh Chase, Briana Evigan, James Lafferty

Go to the listing

General Disclaimer...

Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Checker - Do not copy content from this page. Creative Commons Licence All trademarks, images and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective companies.
KIWIreviews is an independent entity, part of the ePLURIBUS.nz Network. This is a free public forum presenting user opinions on selected products, and as such the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the opinion of KIWIreviews.co.nz and are protected under New Zealand law by the "Honest Opinion" clause of the Defamation Act of 1992. KIWIreviews accepts no liability for statements made on this site, under the assumption that they are the true and honest opinions of the individual posters. In most cases, prices and dates stated are approximate and should be considered as only guidelines.

"Why does someone believe you when you say there are four billion stars, but check when you say the paint is wet?"
unattributed

KIWIreviews Help GuideClick here for the Help Guide Subscribe to our Twitter streamVisit our
Twitter feed
Visit our Facebook pageVisit our
Facebook page
Visit our YouTube ChannelVisit our
YouTube channel
Follow us on instagramVisit our
Instagram album
Visit our Google+ pageVisit our
Google+ page
Visit our Flickr photostreamVisit our
Flickr photostream