Welcome to KIWIreviews - product reviews
•  click here to return to the homepage  •
Welcome visitor.Join us or log in

Product reviews on KIWIreviews.co.nz : Tuesday 25th June 2019 - 12:07:24

QuickSearch for:    What is QuickSearch?
QuickJump to:    What is QuickJump?
logon name: p/w:  
I want to:

You Are Here...

Home > Categories > Movies > Action > Shazam! review

« The River reviewThe RiverThe Hummingbird Project reviewThe Hummingbird Project »

Score: 7.8/10  [1 review]
3 out of 5
ProdID: 8231 - Shazam!
Directed by David Sandberg

Shazam!
Price:
TBC
Sample/s Supplied by:
Click to search for all products supplied by Roadshow (NZ) Ltd

Disclosure StatementFULL DISCLOSURE: A number of units of this product have, at some time, been supplied to KIWIreviews by the company for the purposes of unbiased, independent reviews. No fee was accepted by KIWIreviews or the reviewers themselves - these are genuine, unpaid consumer reviews.
Available:
in selected cinemas 4th April 2019

Shazam! product reviews

Billy Batson is a streetwise 14-year-old who can magically transform into the adult superhero Shazam simply by shouting out one word. His newfound powers soon get put to the test when he squares off against the evil Dr. Thaddeus Sivana.

Check out Roadshow (NZ) Ltd onlineClick here to see all the listings for Roadshow (NZ) Ltd Visit their website They do not have a Twitter account Check them out on Facebook They do not have a YouTube Channel They do not have a Pinterest board They do not have an Instagram channel



Tags:
adam brody   captain marvel   david f sandberg   dc   henry gayden   jack dylan grazer   mark strong   michelle borth   ron cephas jones   ross butler   shazam   zachary levi
Other listings you may be interested in:
Alvin and The ChipmunksAlvin and The Chipmunks
Rating: 8.9
Taboo Season 1Taboo Season 1
Rating: 8.5
Alex CrossAlex Cross
Rating: 6.4
Batman BeginsBatman Begins
Rating: 9.0
Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate EventsLemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events
Rating: 2.8
Monty Python's Life Of BrianMonty Python's Life Of Brian
Rating: 9.3
Liar LiarLiar Liar
Rating: 9.6
The DuchessThe Duchess
Rating: 9.8
JumperJumper
Rating: 8.6
Fool's GoldFool's Gold
Rating: 6.0
RatatouilleRatatouille
Rating: 8.8
Star Trek : NemesisStar Trek : Nemesis
Rating: 5.1
Mr & Mrs SmithMr & Mrs Smith
Rating: 6.8

Product reviews...

Everyone is welcome to post a review. You will need to Join up or log in to post yours.

Click here to read the profile of alexmoulton

Review by: alexmoulton (Alex)
Dated: 30th of March, 2019

Link to this review Report this review

 

This Review: 7.8/10
Pay to see it again:
Score 9 out of 10
Attention Span:
Score 8 out of 10
Believeability:
Score 7 out of 10
Special Effects:
Score 7 out of 10

Another DC film with another tone change, but the DCEU seems to be done with forcing continuity into their film franchise instead focusing on making a good film. Does it succeed though? Let's take a look.

If you have seen the trailer, you will know that this film has a lighter tone, more in line with 'Suicide Squad' than 'Batman v Superman: Dawn Of Justice', and that was a brilliant choice. They have gone all in on this, using the true age of Billy Batson to create some delightful comedic moments playing out the whole "what would you do if you were X-age" fantasies; providing an adult with the mind of a 15-year-old teenager.

The writing, in general, is outstanding, with many jokes getting me to murmur out a laugh or two (and I am a very difficult person to please), but having most of the audience in hysterics at at least one point or another. The most important aspect of it all being that while jokes are written in quite frequently, it never comes across as cheesy or hammy (now I want a sandwich). There is a sense of subtlety to it, and it doesn't linger on it because the movie has other plans it needs to get on with, so the success of the film doesn't rely on the jokes hitting home. It's just a bonus; that's how these things need to be written.

The whole family of the cast are really well chosen. Asher Angel and Jack Dylan Grazer do a top-notch job as the duo of Billy and Freddy, and while some of their conflicts do feel unduly forced, their chemistry otherwise feels legitimate. The remainder of the family of siblings (Ian Chen, Jovan Armand, Grace Fulton, and especially Faithe Herman) all have minor roles but they really help create an authentic family vibe and prevent an otherwise sterile set. Each scene feels like a lived-in environment.

I really did enjoy the build-up and character development in the first act of the film. Care was taken to ensure that all the pieces were in place, as that connection is vital to subsequent protagonist development later in the film.

'Shazam!' does have a bit of a pacing issue though, not where the film feels slow, but from where the audience doesn't get a chance to take a break. There is a very strict and consistent level of plot that keeps ticking along, and you don't get a chance to think about what is going on before it jumps into the next set-piece. While it keeps you transfixed to the screen, it means the storyline does make a sharp turn and accelerate quite considerably in the second act, before a third act that almost feels like the writers were unsure how to pull the arc off.

It has the usual DC struggle where it relies too much on CGI villains. It's one of the reasons why Batman has always done so well on the movie side of things; his scale is much smaller so the villains aren't necessarily as grand and, as a consequence, they usually have a better character development than "I am powerful". 'Shazam!' has a mix of that, with a human villain and some CGI mini-ghost-doomsday monstrosities.

That isn't to say Mark Strong is that much better. While his character does get some development early in the film, it all gets a little one-dimensional and campy. It's as if he was stuck in 'Kingsman' mode (or maybe that is his only acting ability, just like the one character Johnny Depp keeps playing) He is just an outright villain, whose goals don't actually intersect with the hero at all, so it feels rather out-of-place and unnecessary.

The strength of the movie comes from the foster family arc and an exceptional performance from Zachary Levi. Much like Batfleck, I was initially concerned at Zachary Levi being cast in this role, but he really fits the role perfectly, encapsulating that naivety and innocence that comes with youth. The combination of Strong's campy performance and high levels of satirical comedy gives 'Shazam!' a similar tone to that of 'Aquaman' meets 'Deadpool', so you could certainly say this is in the better half of DCEU films.

Guest comments...

Random listing from 'Movies'...

Score: 9.1
Product reviews for listing 3794: Men in Black 3
Directed by Barry Sonnenfeld

Product image for Men in Black 3In Men in Black 3, Agents J and K are back...in time.

J has seen some inexplicable things in his 15 years with the Men in Black, but nothing, not even aliens, perplexes him as much as his wry, reticent partner. But when K's life and the fate of the planet are put at stake, Agent J will have to travel back in time to put things right.

J discovers that there are secrets to the universe that K never told him - secrets ... more...

Go to the listing

General Disclaimer...

Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Checker - Do not copy content from this page. Creative Commons Licence All trademarks, images and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective companies.
KIWIreviews is an independent entity, part of the ePLURIBUS.nz Network. This is a free public forum presenting user opinions on selected products, and as such the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the opinion of KIWIreviews.co.nz and are protected under New Zealand law by the "Honest Opinion" clause of the Defamation Act of 1992. KIWIreviews accepts no liability for statements made on this site, under the assumption that they are the true and honest opinions of the individual posters. In most cases, prices and dates stated are approximate and should be considered as only guidelines.

"The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an bacon-and-eggs breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' but the pig was 'committed'"
anonymous

KIWIreviews Help GuideClick here for the Help Guide Subscribe to our Twitter streamVisit our
Twitter feed
Visit our Facebook pageVisit our
Facebook page
Visit our YouTube ChannelVisit our
YouTube channel
Follow us on instagramVisit our
Instagram album
Visit our Google+ pageVisit our
Google+ page
Visit our Flickr photostreamVisit our
Flickr photostream