Welcome to KIWIreviews - product reviewsClick here to return to homepage
Gidday, from Tucker!
We don't support IE - For a better browsing experience, go get Firefox!
Welcome visitor. Join us or log in

Product reviews on KIWIreviews.co.nz : Friday 25th May 2012

QuickSearch for:    What is QuickSearch?
QuickJump to:    What is QuickJump?
logon name: p/w:  
I want to:

You Are Here...

Home > Categories > Movies > Sci-Fi > Star Trek : Nemesis review

« Chocolate fettucine with chocolate cream sauce reviewChocolate fettucine with chocolate cream sauceLara Croft : Tomb Raider 2 - The Cradle of Life reviewLara Croft : Tomb Raider 2 - The Cradle of Life »

Advertising...

SmileCity
Sick of adverts? Click here to join up for free and be rid of them.

Rating: 4.8  [3 reviews]
1 out of 5
ProdID: 42 - Star Trek : Nemesis
Directed by Stuart Baird

Star Trek : Nemesis
Price:
varies
Supplier:
Click to search for all products supplied by
Available:
your local video store
Buy it:
Search for this on Fishpond.co.nz

Star Trek : Nemesis product reviews

Set a course for a galaxy of unparalleled action and adventure as Captain Jean-Luc Picard (Patrick Stewart) and his crew battle a chilling new adversary... that just happens to hold a shocking link to Picard!

Co-starring Brent Spiner, LeVar Burton, Michael Dorn, Gates McFadden and introducing Tom Hardy as Picard's deadly foe.



Tags:
brent spiner   gates mcfadden   levar burton   michael dorn   patrick stewart   star trek   tom hardy
Related Listings:
-none-

Product reviews...

Everyone is welcome to post a review. You will need to Join up or log in to post yours.

Click here to read the profile of mizim

Review by: mizim
Dated: 8th of April, 2012

Report this review

 

This Review Score:
Score 4 out of 10

Pay to see it again:
Score 1 out of 10
Attention Span:
Score 3 out of 10
Believeability:
Score 3 out of 10
Special Effects:
Score 9 out of 10

Great for special effects, great for nothing else at all.

I grew up watching Star Trek practically every single day of my childhood thanks to a father who is nutty about Star Trek, and even he ranks this in the bottom 3, first up for elimination please!

Some bits were awful, others not thought out well, holes in it that a starship could fit through with room to spare and some bits were just plain awful.

From a TV series that great, and for their last movie I would have expected far better and I'm sure a few people would have gotten themselves fired over this. With a movie like this it was no wonder people were concerned and sceptical of number 11.

This movie is one I would own, but only so that I would have a full collection, not to watch, ever.

Click here to read the profile of kiwireviewer-01

Review by: kiwireviewer-01
Dated: 22nd of June, 2004

Report this review

 

This Review Score:
Score 4 out of 10

Pay to see it again:
Score 3 out of 10
Attention Span:
Score 3 out of 10
Believeability:
Score 4 out of 10
Special Effects:
Score 7 out of 10

After a brief few minutes thinking Star Trek had finally been made into a comedy, I started to hope that this would turn into a wonderful epic movie, but alas no, it merely got worse, from the lack of gripping plot to the hmmmm I think i've seen this before feeling, this was no Lord of the Rings.

I was almost ready to give the movie a higher score on the believeability rating until I saw the Enterprise Vs Scimitar battle (Enterprise Shields approx 0% Scimitar Shields approx 70%) and saw the Enterprise just sail on through the Scimitar's sheilds to ram them. I mean come on guys not a good move, you just totaly disproved the entire theory about starship shields in one move.

All in all not a movie i'd recommend seeing.

Click here to read the profile of kiwireviewer-00

Review by: kiwireviewer-00
Dated: 28th of December, 2003

Report this review

 

This Review Score:
Score 6 out of 10

Pay to see it again:
Score 4 out of 10
Attention Span:
Score 4 out of 10
Believeability:
Score 7 out of 10
Special Effects:
Score 9 out of 10

I wasn't overly impressed with this one, being the latest installment in the long and proud lineage of Star Trek movies. Even with all the storylines getting heavily thrashed these days, it was quite disappointing.

Weak in so many places, the plot had little goig for it. A few minour twists kept me off-track in places, but overall it was quite predictable, making for low enjoyment.

About as believable as the series, this had no surprises, so left me cold on the techno-front. Nothing really new or novel in the weapons or tools department. Those replicator units sure do have an impressive library of stuff they churn out with such ease. Scan it, store it, clone it. Seems to be the theme for that 'world'.

However, as per usual, the special effects were right up there. Couldn't spot any glaring glitches, so felt reasonably good about assigning a high score there.

Overall, not really impressed at all.

Guest comments...

Everyone is welcome to have their say. - click here to post your comment -

Comment #253 - Posted by: Alfred

This has got to be one of the worst Star Trek films of all. I just hope J. J. Abrams does a better job of Star Trek XI.

Random listing from 'Movies'...

Score: 8.0
Product reviews for listing 83: Underworld
Directed by Len Wiseman

Product image for UnderworldWhen night falls, the battle begins. Unbeknownst to the human world, a centuries-old feud between warring Vampire and Lycan (werewolf) clans is escalating to a bloody and brutal climax. Armed with an arsenal of deadly weapons both ancient and modern, these mortal enemies are unrelenting in their quest to wipe each other from the face of the earth.

Cast Includes:
Kate Beckinsale
Scott Speedman
Bill ... more...

Go to the listing

General Disclaimer...

Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Checker - Do not copy content from this page. Creative Commons Licence All trademarks, images and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective companies.
This is a free public forum presenting user opinions on selected products, and as such the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the opinion of KIWIreviews.co.nz and are protected under New Zealand law by the "Honest Opinion" clause of the Defamation Act of 1992. KIWIreviews accepts no liability for statements made on this site, under the assumption that they are the true and honest opinions of the individual posters. In most cases, prices and dates stated are approximate and should be considered as only guidelines.

"Why do we press harder on a remote control when we know the batteries are flat?"
unattributed

KIWIreviews Help GuideClick here for the Help Guide Subscribe to our Twitter streamVisit our
Twitter feed
Visit our Facebook pageVisit our
Facebook page
Visit our YouTube ChannelVisit our
YouTube channel
Visit our Google+ pageVisit our
Google+ page
Visit our about.me pageVisit our
About.Me page
Visit our LinkedIn profileVisit our
LinkedIn profile
Follow us on foursquareVisit our
Foursquare page