Home > Categories > Movies > Family > Where the Wild Things Are review

Sick of adverts? Click here to join up for free and be rid of them.
An adaptation of Maurice Sendak's classic children's story, where Max, a disobedient little boy sent to bed without his supper, creates his own world - a forest inhabited by ferocious wild creatures that crown Max as their ruler.
Product reviews...
I went to my movie with my grandson who was seemingly the only child who remained engaged with the story - declaring at the end "Nani, those monster's sure were in need of some therapy aye!"
This movie really misses the mark as 'family entertainment' - not for its 'darkness' (those of us who remember Watership Down and The Dark Crystal will understand that darkness can have its place in movies designed for old and young alike) but more for its 'self-indulgence'. The story line of Maxx's journey of self-discovery, meeting aspects of self depicted as characters and resolving issues he struggles with seems to have taken a backseat to the everyday issues of adults instead.
At least one characteristic of childhood seems to have been successfully conveyed, if the audience was any indication - the way in which a mere couple of hours can seem like forever.
I actually enjoyed this movie - but not for a creative work that would take me from the world in which I reside to an imaginary world that was the creation of another's mind but rather, as an interesting opportunity to observe and ponder the mind of the creator and that of the audience. My grandson as an unusually thoughtful wee chap, found sufficient to keep him engaged but, for most, Where the Wild Ones Are seemed to leave them bored and restless.
Perhaps better suited to those who enjoy those "arty/alternative" type movies that are all about the creators expression of self - even if they don't have much to say.
A great adaptation of the classic children's book that many of us grew up with.
I admit to being surprised at some of the story alterations that were made, and despite being a wonderfully evocative escapade into the wonders of childhood imagination, it still seems a little flat in places, and almost pointless in others. The movie itself was full of amazing cinematic skill, yet I wonder how it expected to ever live up to the 'classic icon' status the source book still rates today, almost 50 years later.
What this movie does do though, in spades, is explore the darker reaches of a child's mind in a way that even adults can find accessible. It takes us back to an age before society and rules became understandable, acceptable, or even tolerable, back to an age where the lack of ability to do as we please brought all the seething anger and fear to the surface and made us the 'terrible little anklebiters' our parent both adored and dreaded in equal measure.
As a parent myself I now understand what my parents meant when they said "Our revenge on you for your childhood behaviour will be to sit back and watch you try and cope with your kids." - less than charming, but prophetic none the less. This movie reminds me of what was happening in my head when I was sent to bed early as a punishment for the misdeeds of my youth, and though I can see what Jonze was getting at, I still feel somewhat let down by the results.
All in all, a mixed bag this one. On the one hand a worthy attempt at a modern adaptation, while on the other hand a somewhat limp offering from a respected director who maybe should stick to his greater achievements in music videos and the Jackass series.
Guest comments...
There are currently no comments on file. Will you click here and be the first?
Random listing from 'Movies'...
A genetic anomaly allows a young man to teleport himself anywhere. He discovers this gift has existed for centuries and finds himself in a war that has been raging for thousands of years between "Jumpers" and "Paladins", those who have sworn to kill them.
All trademarks, images and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective companies.
This is a free public forum presenting user opinions on selected products, and as such the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the opinion of KIWIreviews.co.nz and are protected under New Zealand law by the "Honest Opinion" clause of the Defamation Act of 1992. KIWIreviews accepts no liability for statements made on this site, under the assumption that they are the true and honest opinions of the individual posters. In most cases, prices and dates stated are approximate and should be considered as only guidelines.
"I'm tired of all this nonsense about beauty being only skin-deep. That's deep enough. What do you want, an adorable pancreas?"
Jean Kerr