Welcome to KIWIreviews - product reviews
•  click here to return to the homepage  •
Welcome visitor.Join us or log in

Product reviews on KIWIreviews.co.nz : Tuesday 21st January 2020 - 04:14:32

QuickSearch for:    What is QuickSearch?
QuickJump to:    What is QuickJump?
logon name: p/w:  
I want to:

You Are Here...

Home > Categories > Software > Security > Norton Internet Security 2010 review

« Jabra BT530 Bluetooth Headset with USB reviewJabra BT530 Bluetooth Headset with USBNightlight reviewNightlight »

Score: 9.8/10  [1 review]
5 out of 5
ProdID: 2356 - Norton Internet Security 2010
Created by Symantec

Norton Internet Security 2010
Sample/s Supplied by:
Click to search for all products supplied by Symantec

Disclosure StatementFULL DISCLOSURE: A number of units of this product have, at some time, been supplied to KIWIreviews by the company for the purposes of unbiased, independent reviews. No fee was accepted by KIWIreviews or the reviewers themselves - these are genuine, unpaid consumer reviews.
at qualitry retailers

Norton Internet Security 2010 product reviews

Safer. Smarter. Faster. Experience the New Norton.

Why Choose Norton Internet Security?
    •  IMPROVED! Stops online identity theft, viruses, spyware, bots and more - Guards your PC, online activities, and your identity against all types of Internet threats.
    •  IMPROVED! Stops attacks before they get on your PC - Proactively blocks hackers and prevents dangerous software from downloading to your computer when you surf the web.
    •  NEW! Delivers clear threat and performance explanations - Gives you greater insight into downloaded applications and files by telling you where they came from, if they can be trusted, and how they may impact your PC's resources and performance.
    •  NEW! Identifies unsafe web sites right in your search results - Warns you of dangerous web sites and suspicious sellers so you can surf and shop online with confidence.
    •  Uses intelligence-driven Norton Insight Network for faster, fewer, shorter scans - Detects and eliminates dangerous software with the shortest scan times of any security product.

Check out Symantec onlineClick here to see all the listings for Symantec Visit their website They do not have a Twitter account They do not have a Facebook page They do not have a YouTube Channel They do not have a Pinterest board They do not have an Instagram channel

antivirus   backup   firewall   identity theft   insight   malware   network   norton   protection   quorum   symantec   tuneup
Other listings you may be interested in:
Norton Internet SecurityNorton Internet Security
Rating: 9.0
Norton Internet Security 2005 - AntiSpyware EditionNorton Internet Security 2005 - AntiSpyware Edition
Rating: 9.5
Norton Internet Security 2006Norton Internet Security 2006
Rating: 9.8
Norton Internet Security 2009Norton Internet Security 2009
Rating: 9.6
Norton Internet Security for Mac (v4.1)Norton Internet Security for Mac (v4.1)
Rating: 9.5
Norton Internet Security 2011Norton Internet Security 2011
Rating: 10.0
Norton Internet Security 2012Norton Internet Security 2012
Rating: 9.3
PLUGIN: RetrodotsPLUGIN: Retrodots
Rating: 9.0
Norton Ghost v10.0Norton Ghost v10.0
Rating: 8.0
Adobe Acrobat 3dAdobe Acrobat 3d
Rating: 8.8
TUMONZ - The Ultimate Map of NZ : v5TUMONZ - The Ultimate Map of NZ : v5
Rating: 9.5
Adobe Creative Suite 5.5 - Master CollectionAdobe Creative Suite 5.5 - Master Collection
Rating: 9.8
SmartDraw 2012SmartDraw 2012
Rating: 9.8

Product reviews...

Everyone is welcome to post a review. You will need to Join up or log in to post yours.

Click here to read the profile of tucker

Review by: tucker (Karl)
Dated: 12th of November, 2009

Link to this review Report this review


This Review: 9.8/10
Score 10 out of 10
Score 10 out of 10
Score 9 out of 10
Personal Choice:
Score 10 out of 10

After the 2009 edition blew me away, I was hard-pressed to figure out just how they were going to make this one any better. What, artificially-intelligent virtual spies summoned up to hunt nasties in the system? And you know what... that's kinda what they did! Except, instead of a ravening horde of little code warriors, they have us... the community of Norton product users... and a collective intelligence system aptly called "Quorum".

quorum (kwor-um) : noun.
1. The minimal number of officers and members of a committee or organization, usually a majority, who must be present for valid transaction of business.
2. A select group.

Quorum is a system that copes with those annoying files that are neither clearly white-hat or black-hat, by assessing them based on their prevalence and 'reputation' amongst the collective Norton userbase. Let me put it this way... as the security industry is well aware, there are three main security methodologies: Black-, Grey- and White-list based, bahaviour-detection based, and file signatures. They all have the same failing however... they are statistical tools that work best on large volumes of known files... but are utterly useless on unknown files that occur in very small volumes. Enter Quorum... it draws on the knowledge of millions of users... if a file is extremely rare, comes from an unknown, or known-bad, source, and was created very recently, it is unlikely to be a valid file... more likely a one-shot piece of malware generated on the fly to beat the list and signature based systems.

Because traditional malware protection has a series of unavoidable delays - first a file has to be suspected by a user, then submitted for investigation, then processed for damage assessment and threat potential, and finally studied for reliable detection and eradication methods - malware authors have learned that the window of opportunity has shrunk to around 24 hours or less, thus the threats have evolved too - now the most effective malware tools are generated 'on the fly' as you visit and infected website or download a new application from a torrent for example, and have variable behaviour patterns... beating all of the traditional security protocols easily. Mutating code beats signature-based security, while it's unique nature makes it relatively immune to list-based systems and novel behaviour routines confuse bahaviour-based detection tools. So, because it is a new file, relatively unique amongst the community, and has no reputation, the user is warned off allowing or using it. This effectively neuters the malware's greatest tool, and ensures that their greatest feature is the one that will ultimately make their tools MORE detectable.

Now this isn't some Nazi'esque system that states "I do not trust zis file, you are verboten to use it. I vill kill it now!" - it is simply a user-informing system that says "Well mate, this one looks a bit dodgy... use it if YOU trust it, but be aware it could be a nasty." then leaves it to the user to make up their own mind. This somewhat flies in the face of Norton's latest ethic of "Look, why ask the user? Years of experience and research tells us X is bad, Y is good... so let's save them the stress and automate that bit." but it leaves the ultimate control in the hands of the user, and if they are unsure, it also advised to hold off using the file, and check it again in a few hours to see if has become more 'trusted and acceptable' by the community. But fear not... this is only an *added* level of protection... all the tradtional systems are still in place and just as effective... Quorum simply adds another tool in the ongoing war on malware stupidity.

As well as this newest tool, which has actually been passively integrated into the last few versions, collecting test data and file statistics but is only now an active component, this suite has all the usual gadgets: antivirus of the traditional support, firewall, identity protection, content filters, web-browser protection (for most, but not all, browsers), email scanning and intrusion protection. And as with the 2009 suite, this system comes with independant CPU vs Nortons resource usage meters, providing clear evidence that though Norton's CAN use up all of your system resources, it only does so when you aren't active. While you are on the machine, Norton's quietly sits back and let's you hog it for yourself.

For users of last year's offering, the new interface has few surprises. A new skin - less of a window and more of a flat-panel touchscreen effect, which I personally think is a great style that should be adopted by more application designers, and a new "flip screen" gadget that literally rolls the main window over to reveal a secondary screen with more information and tools. You can't miss it, it's the big bent-around arrow in the bottom-left corner that wasn't there last year. Wink Icon Other that, all the features and tools, methods of configuration, and reporting graphs are all pretty much the same, though you may notice a few minor differences, particularly the new easy-to-access System Insight report that displays little marker icons at key events. This can be helpful to track down any sudden new problems... a quick look at this report will show you if problems were always happening, or only started to manifest themselves after you installed a particular piece of software, for example.

For those who just want a quick overview, the main screen will be more than sufficent, but for the die-hards, drilling down through the layers of links will give you pretty much all the details you could want, plus a few that you probably don't need. Such as the Vulnerability Protection tab, which lists all the software Norton's are aware of that are vulnerable to attack... the downside of this list: It's not restricted to the software YOU have... it's the whole swag! A bit pointless, a nightmare to plow through, and could easily be made far more useful by automatically filtering it against your system's actual app list... after all, it knows every file on your beast, so surely it can't be THAT hard to prune it down? Maybe in 2011...

You'll find other updated features are very effective, such as the new anti-spam engine... which surprisingly is no longer a Norton tool, but now uses Brightmail's engine. Reports vary, but they all confirm that this is between 15-20% better than last year's Norton-based engine. Will wonders never cease? And finally there's the kids to consider... and the package comes with a free subscription to OnlineFamily - a content-control system that filters the results of search traffic from some of the major searchengines and reports on their potential threat rating. You could use browser plug-ins to do the same thing, such as the highly effective Web of Trust (WoT) plugin for Firefox, but OnlineFamily is a bit more than simply a rating system, so is going to provide you more trustworthy results.

On a more pragmatic level, the tests we ran were on a moderately well-infected system, with a range of malware that was from across the detection spectrum. Some of it would test the signature-based protection, some the behavioural, and some was fresh unique code downloaded from a site known to be infected with drive-by download malware. NIS '10 managed an impressive 99.8% accurate detection rate on the first pass, and cleaned up the rest less than 2 minutes later after a pulse update brough it up to speed. Sure enough, Quorum detected them first, but was unable to advise clearly... which is quite acceptable really... better to leave it to the user when certainty wasn't at 95% or better. Only one false-positive, and that was from our booby-prize file... a keygen application downloaded at random from the internet. Known to be clean, it was to be expected. No anti-malware system likes keygens, even clean ones. Wink Icon

Overall, once again Symantec have outdone themselves. The new features add value as well as greater security to ensure your online experience is as safe and secure as it's possible to get, while still leaving the user free to get on with things without being bombarded by pointless drivel messages that confuse... often leading to some bad choices and a lot of pointless abuse of an innocent and effective tool. We did encounter one strange issue when it came to this, and though we at first thought to blame NIS, it was actually NIS that helped us discover the REAL cause... at the same time as we were evaluating this, we were also testing some external storage devices, and found the system would crash and we'd get a visit from the BSoD Fairy if we unplugged a drive. This behaviour only began after we installed NIS '10... but with the aid of the System Insight report, we were able to pin the actual start of the trouble down to the installation of a second drive managment utility that conflicted with the first one... the second one was installed 8 hours AFTER we installed NIS... and the reports confirmed the actual cause and link... so well done Norton, you kept your reputation clean, and proved your effectiveness in one fell swoop.

Guest comments...

Random listing from 'Software'...

Score: 9.0
Product reviews for listing 1861: Ubuntu Linux 8.04 Desktop Edition -  Developed by Canonical Ltd

Product image for Ubuntu Linux 8.04 Desktop EditionAbout Ubuntu

Ubuntu is a community developed, Linux-based operating system that is perfect for laptops, desktops and servers. It contains all the applications you need - a web browser, presentation, document and spreadsheet software, instant messaging and much more.

The Ubuntu promise
    • Ubuntu will always be free of charge, including ... more...

Go to the listing

General Disclaimer...

Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Checker - Do not copy content from this page. Creative Commons Licence All trademarks, images and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective companies.
KIWIreviews is an independent entity, part of the ePLURIBUS.nz Network. This is a free public forum presenting user opinions on selected products, and as such the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the opinion of KIWIreviews.co.nz and are protected under New Zealand law by the "Honest Opinion" clause of the Defamation Act of 1992. KIWIreviews accepts no liability for statements made on this site, under the assumption that they are the true and honest opinions of the individual posters. In most cases, prices and dates stated are approximate and should be considered as only guidelines.

"Before you criticise someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes... That way, when you criticise them, you're a mile away, and you have their shoes."